elsane: (waterloo)
elsane ([personal profile] elsane) wrote 2013-05-30 05:09 pm (UTC)

Glad you enjoyed!

Oh yes, it took me some time to get used to the whiplash of going from cinematic, tense action scenes bam into essays -- I have to read those sections with different mental settings, and the suddenness of the change in required reading protocols can be exhausting. And I definitely think he could have stood to streamline the essays a bit! (and I would cut Marius' overwrought love poetry entirely, oh god. Much harder to get through than Waterloo. :P)

But oh my goodness. A better novel, if he had separated the main story out? Perhaps. But IMO a much smaller and less successful book. It's an amazing thing, what Hugo's done here, and it's much more than a novel in the usual sense. He's managed to collapse the foreground into the background and the background into the foreground without losing sight of the relative scope -- to have a story where the small and large are equally important but never out of proportion -- and it's an amazing, amazing accomplishment. I argue with him a lot, but. An amazing accomplishment.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting